Case 3

[rarity]

Turnabout Doggie:

Ruddadog has been murdered and its up to you to find the real killer

Before any writing is done we need to decide whodunit

Personally I think that "Frasier" should be found guilty since after Minecraft Adventure it has clearly been seen that he is a dog killer and hater. Who used his powerful sexual influence on "Ken" in order to trick him into killing Ruddadog.

Some names were changed to protect the innocent.

[theweirdomaxim]

We shouldn't...as it Fraser is the main character

[ironicsalmon]

Actually Phoenix had to defend himself a few times

[zokoke]

So, Fraser has to defend himself, or someone else is accused. I could see Fraser defending himself, but I would like to see something different from the game first. If we put Ben on the stand, Fraser would be forced to defend him and make things more complicated. Especially if he doesn't want to defend Ben.

[Soghog]

Actually I already had that idea, but with Deacon. Besides, why wouldn't Fraser want to defend Ben?

[zokoke]

I was going off the idea that Fraser still blames Ben for killing Ruddadog. That was my thinking at least. I'm just trying to think of who would make the accusation against Fraser.

[theweirdomaxim]

here's the plan
1: someone blame that Fraser kill the dog
2: Fraser blamed Ben
3: people find out the Fraser told a lie
4: Fraser need to find out who really did it

[zokoke]

Who blamed Fraser, and will they be the one who really did it?

[janja50]

You know i think we could make this an extra case with everything in minecraft style (you know minecraft courthouse,judge characters.)
If you do it like that you can even let a creeper testify:)
SO maybe as bonus case when you finish the game that way it doesnt have to make sence

[ironicsalmon]

YES! And the music can be done in note blocks! Maybe this could be a "Case 5" Type of thing?

[theweirdomaxim]

Case 5 (bonus): Turnabout MINECRAFT
Victim: Notch =P

[caelnias]

I'm no expert on the Ace Attorney games, but I do believe it actually is a unique situation if Fraser needs to defend himself and is actually guilty. Now the aftermath would be the problem. Either it'd have to be the last case, as Fraser's sent to jail for being found guilty, or the sentence is very light and the game can continue. It'd of course be totally morally wrong if Fraser was able to falsely prove himself innocent.

[janja50]

What if because fraser is suspect becky (his assistent) needs to defend him since she is the only one who kows about the investigation.

We could even let becky play the case cause by that time she will know how the game works.

[theweirdomaxim]

no... Fraser need to defend himself

[ironicsalmon]

Morally wrong? sure

Interesting case with a crazy end if he does win the game: nice